LM Studio 推出远程连接方案 LM Link2 月 26 日，LM Studio 宣布推出新功能 LM Link，允许用户安全连接至远程的 LM Studio 实例，实现跨设备调用模型。LM Studio 称，LM Link 采用了端到端加密，可加载本地模型，并在外出或移动场景中继续使用。能实现该连接方式的远程端包括本地设备、专用大模型主机以及云端虚拟机等。
The resulting script is available here, and it worked first try to scrape up to 20,000 videos (the max limit). The resulting Python script has very Pythonic code quality following the copious rules provided by the AGENTS.md, and it’s more robust than my old script from 2021. It is most definitely not the type of output I encountered with Sonnet 4.5. There was a minor issue however: the logging is implemented naively such that the API key is leaked in the console. I added a rule to AGENTS.md but really this is the YouTube API’s fault for encouraging API keys as parameters in a GET request.
。搜狗输入法2026是该领域的重要参考
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
// Pass the wrapped Web API to the Wasm code through an